A generation of workers are going to need to adjust to a global interest rate environment that is up to five times higher than which they are accustomed. According to a paper (Tidal Forces: Dissecting the interest rate equation) from BNY Mellon Investment Management’s chief economist, Shamik Dhar, rates are likely to settle between 4.5% and 5.5% – a range not seen since 2008 and certainly more reminiscent of the 1980s and 1990s.
1.Inflationary shocks likely more common
2.Political interference with central banks on the rise?
3.Is inflation targeting dead?
4.Productivity performance is on the cusp of a generational improvement
5.Ageing workers changing demand/supply dynamics
“The 2008-19 period is extremely unusual by historic standards. According to the Bank of England database, which is the longest consistent record we have, there has never been a period in the 300 years of their records where interest rates have been so low for so long.”
Many think tanks argue that once the disruption from Covid-19 works its way through the global financial system there will be a return to lower interest rates.
However, the paper’s co-author Sebastian Vismara, senior economist on BNY Mellon’s Global Economic and Investment Analysis (GEIA) team, headed by Dhar, purports today’s situation is not just a fallout of years of quantitative easing programmes post the financial crisis, nor is it solely down to repercussions of the global pandemic.
“While any effort to provide a point estimate for interest rates in the forthcoming decade is riddled with uncertainty, we see a high probability that the global economy is transitioning into a higher interest rates regime.”
Inflation’s haunting effects
There is a myriad of factors, not the least of which is the lingering impact of inflation, higher productivity growth and climate transition costs. Added to the mix is a challenging demographics picture and high levels of government debt in the western world. In aggregate such ingredients fuel the likelihood rates will be higher for longer, the team says. This will have a corresponding effect on investment opportunities and risks, Vismara and Dhar add.
Dhar notes: “The long-term average interest rate is an enormously important economic variable: for both economic policy makers and for investors. For investors, the ‘safe rate of interest’ is the key rate off which all other assets are priced. So being able to forecast the long-term average level of interest rates is crucial for economic policy makers and financial investors.”
Inflation and rates
Dhar believes inflationary shocks may be more common going forward than they have been in the past two decades. As a consequence, he adds, the nominal interest rate required to deliver price stability may end up higher too.
In the rule of unintended consequences, the 1980s switch towards inflation targeting alongside prevailing long-term secular disinflation trends also resulted in lowered policy interest rates, the team’s analysis states.
In general inflation targets may need to be reviewed and even raised in the future, the paper asserts. “Even if targets aren’t raised de jure1, central banks may be prepared to tolerate inflation deviations from target for longer, especially if the economic costs of hitting the inflation target rise.”
Dhar and Vismara argue it could be that inflation targeting has had its day and that political interference with central banks is on the rise. The paper reads: “There is a perfectly legitimate debate to be had about the correct level of the inflation target: after all, for much of the post-financial crisis period, many economists were arguing the target was too low at 2%, because negative demand shocks could too easily and frequently send us towards the zero bound.”
“Permanent inflationary shocks could become more common in future, especially if deglobalization and the disruption of global supply chains make negative supply shocks more common. Put another way, if globalization previously reduced underlying inflationary pressure for a long time, making it easier for central banks to hit their inflation targets at relatively low interest rates, then it is reasonable to assume that deglobalization will have the opposite impact.”
Fat tails
The past few years has seen several extraordinary events affect markets and the global economy – like a war and pandemic. Such disruptions to the normal functioning of trade and economies often result in a higher probability of extreme outcomes – something economists call fat tails.
Dhar says in a world, like today, characterised by “fat tail shocks” volatility will be more present but may be less impactful as a dampener on rates. “As the global economy undergoes several transitions - technological, demographic, geopolitical and climate-related - we expect to see changes in the risks to growth in a way that puts less downside pressure on real rates.” Dhar and Vismara’s research says the frequency and size of shocks, alongside proactive fiscal and monetary policy by authorities, mean growth is likely to see greater fluctuations but also more balance between downside and upside risks going forward.
Transitions
Today’s global transition to greener technology and energy is another force likely to impact the level of rates over the long term, argue the paper’s authors. There are many factors involved in the replacement of “polluting” capital by green capital over the coming years and many are hard to forecast. However, the impetus behind the overall trend Dhar says, leads him to conclude its impact will result in “modest upward pressure on real rates over the next 20-30 years, front-loaded into the 2030s.”
Read more about why interest rates are likely to stay higher than seen in the past 15 years. Tidal Forces: Dissecting the interest rate equation focuses on the following:
- Productivity growth
- Demographic change
- The climate transition
- Economic volatility
- Government debt and financial repression
-
WHY BONDS NOW?
An inverted relationship between bonds and rates means traditionally fixed income is considered a casualty of a higher interest rate environment. But after years of insipid yields, today that relationship may result in a more attractive income prospect for bonds, according to BNY Mellon IM’s chief economist Shamik Dhar.
In a paper he co-authored, Tidal Forces: Dissecting the interest rate equation, Dhar argues that for many reasons interest rates are likely to stay higher for longer. In pushing up bond yields to levels not on offer for some time, the income buffer is likely to be compensatory for the fall in bond prices that typically occurs amid high rates, he notes. Managers at BNY Mellon Investment Management agree, noting the sharp rise in yields already seen in the first half of 2023 has produced an attractive yield. BNY Mellon Investment Management highlights the Bloomberg US Agg Index as an example, which at the end of August 2023 was yielding just under 5%, with a duration of just over six years. On the 3 October 2023 the 30-year US Treasury hit its highest yield since 2007, according to Bloomberg reports.
According to BNY Mellon Investment Management: “If the neutral level of rates has moved higher and yields remain at these levels over the years to come, then it is possible to earn a healthy level of income, towards the bottom of the ranges normally used for long-term equity returns. If markets start to price in an even higher neutral rate and yields drift upwards, then the income generated is sufficient to absorb an 80bp upward move before losses are incurred, and even a 100bp rise in yields from here would still incur only a small loss.”
Read more >>
1 de jure - refers to what happens according to the law, in contrast to de facto, which is used to refer to what happens in practice or in reality.
Important Information
For sole and exclusive use by Institutional Investors, Accredited Investors and Professional Investors only. Not for further distribution. This is a financial promotion and is not investment advice. Any views and opinions are those of the investment manager, unless otherwise noted. The value of investment can fall. Investors may not get back the amount invested. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and its subsidiaries. In Hong Kong, the issuer of this document is BNY Mellon Investment Management Hong Kong Limited, which is registered with the Securities and Futures Commission (Central Entity Number: AQI762). BNY Mellon Investment Management Hong Kong Limited and any other BNY Mellon entity mentioned are ultimately owned by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and its subsidiaries. In Singapore this document is issued by BNY Mellon Investment Management Singapore Pte. Limited, Co. Reg. 201230427E. Regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. BNY Mellon Investment Management Hong Kong Limited and any other BNY Mellon entity(ies) mentioned are ultimately owned by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and its subsidiaries.
Important Information
Not for further distribution. This is a financial promotion and is not investment advice. Any views and opinions are those of the investment manager, unless otherwise noted. The value of investment can fall. Investors may not get back the amount invested. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and its subsidiaries. In Hong Kong, the issuer of this document is BNY Mellon Investment Management Hong Kong Limited, which is registered with the Securities and Futures Commission (Central Entity Number: AQI762). BNY Mellon Investment Management Hong Kong Limited and any other BNY Mellon entity mentioned are ultimately owned by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and its subsidiaries. In Singapore this document is issued by BNY Mellon Investment Management Singapore Pte. Limited, Co. Reg. 201230427E. Regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. BNY Mellon Investment Management Hong Kong Limited and any other BNY Mellon entity(ies) mentioned are ultimately owned by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and its subsidiaries.
MC250-30-10-2023 (6M)
